Opened 14 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

#219 closed defect (fixed)

reexport with renaming fails when import libraries are used

Reported by: felix winkelmann Owned by: sjamaan
Priority: major Milestone: 4.9.0
Component: expander Version:
Keywords: syntax Cc:
Estimated difficulty:

Description

In the following code s2 in the expansion of s1 will not be found when foo1 is used via an import library:

(module foo *
(import scheme)
(define-syntax s1 
  (syntax-rules () ((_) (s2))))
(define-syntax s2 
  (syntax-rules () ((_) (display 1)))))

(module foo1 ()
(reexport (prefix foo f:)))
(import foo1)
(f:s1)

Attachments (1)

0001-Attempt-to-fix-219-where-renamed-reexports-are-not-c.patch (4.1 KB) - added by felix winkelmann 10 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (6)

comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by felix winkelmann

Milestone: 4.9.0

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by sjamaan

After some investigation, it became clear that the set-car! calls in the foreaches of {{##sys#register-compiled-module}} are clobbering the carefully saved syntax environments of each macro.

In the example, when {{foo1}} is imported and the {{find-reexport}} helper procedure in {{##sys#register-compiled-module}} finds the matching original binding ({{s1}} for {{f1:s1}}) that's being re-exported, it has a syntax environment containing both {{s1}} and {{s2}}.
You can see this in action if you apply this debugging patch:

diff --git a/modules.scm b/modules.scm
index b1571c2..4c78320 100644
--- a/modules.scm
+++ b/modules.scm
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 
 (include "common-declarations.scm")
 
-(define-syntax d (syntax-rules () ((_ . _) (void))))
+#;(define-syntax d (syntax-rules () ((_ . _) (void))))
 
 (define-alias dd d)
 (define-alias dm d)
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
   (define (find-reexport name)
     (let ((a (assq name (##sys#macro-environment))))
       (if (and a (pair? (cdr a)))
-	  a
+	  (begin (dm `(FOUND-REEXP: ,(car a) ---> ,(map-se (cadr a)))) a)
 	  (##sys#error
 	   'import "cannot find implementation of re-exported syntax"
 	   name))))

However, after the module is register, if you inspect {{##sys#module-environment}}, the syntax environment attached to {{f1:s1}} contains {{f1:s1}} and {{f1:s2}}. It's been replaced by the foreach loops.

I'm unsure how to fix this. What's the reason these environments are reset the way they are?

comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by sjamaan

Damn you, Trac syntax

comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by felix winkelmann

Owner: set to sjamaan
Status: newassigned

I think you are on the right track, sjamaan. I have modified ##sys#register-compiled-module to merge the new SE with the existing SE for each import, instead of blindly overwriting it. I'm not completely sure whether this is necessary for all imports, but so far it seems to work.

I have added a test-case and all other tests seem to run ok. I have not attempted a full bootstrap, but since chicken itself doesn't use such deep module magic, this shouldn't be a problem.

A patch is attached.

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by sjamaan

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

Fixed by 4777fb07523457614296e3a1d037f5d8266f464d

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.