Opened 3 weeks ago
Last modified 3 weeks ago
#1859 new defect
Type information doesn't survive calls to define-inline procedures
Reported by: | sjamaan | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | someday |
Component: | scrutinizer | Version: | 6.0.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Estimated difficulty: | medium |
Description
Compile the following to C:
(module foo () (import scheme (chicken base) (chicken plist)) (let ((x (gensym))) (put! 'foo x 1)) (define-inline (put-one! sym prop) (put! sym prop 1)) (let ((y (gensym))) (put-one! 'foo y)))
Note that the first call to put! gets rewritten to C_a_i_putprop(&a,3,lf[1],t1,C_fix(1))
, but the second call remains a CPS call to chicken.plist#put!
via procedure lookup.
This is unexpected, as inlining by hand should give the same results as calling a define-inline
procedure.
If you restore the typing info by hand, it also works as expected:
(define-inline (put-one! sym prop) (put! (the symbol sym) (the symbol prop) 1))
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
BTW, it's also a bit strange that the types can't be determined for procedures that get contracted or inlined by the compiler when using regular
define
.