Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#1037 closed defect (fixed)
byte-blob-find fails on certain matches on 32-bit Chicken
| Reported by: | dthedens | Owned by: | Ivan Raikov |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | someday |
| Component: | extensions | Version: | 4.7.x |
| Keywords: | byte-blob, 32-bit | Cc: | |
| Estimated difficulty: |
Description
(byte-blob-find (list->byte-blob (list 1 31)) (list->byte-blob (list 0 1 31 3)))
fails to match on 32-bit, but succeeds on 64-bit. Replace 31 with any byte value with low 5 bits all set (63, 95, etc.) and matches also fail. This may be related to the fact that internal function (swizzle 31) -> 0 on 32-bit, but is #x80000000 on 64-bit.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
| Owner: | set to Ivan Raikov |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → accepted |
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
Yes, this seems to have fixed my small test case as well as my original problem on 32 bit. Thanks for the quick turnaround!
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | accepted → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Hello, thanks for the bug report. I have rewritten swizzle so that it does not rely on 64-bit integers, and I have made a new release of byte-blob. Please try it out and let me know if it works for you.