Custom Query (1630 matches)
Results (49 - 51 of 1630)
Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
---|---|---|---|---|
#821 | worksforme | bloom-filter's test failure: Error: call of non-procedure: #<unspecified> | ||
Description |
bloom-filter's test suite shows some errors on 2012-04-30: http://tests.call-cc.org/master/linux/x86/2012/04/30/salmonella-report/test/bloom-filter.html The day before tests were working: http://tests.call-cc.org/master/linux/x86/2012/04/29/salmonella-report/test/bloom-filter.html |
|||
#826 | worksforme | srfi-63 is intended to be compiled in case-insensitive mode | ||
Description |
See the documentation. The "charplot" egg depends on this. We can change srfi-63 to export the uppercase identifiers but should then change charplot accordingly and update the documentation |
|||
#841 | worksforme | tuples and skiplists: Many warnings (probably due to the contracts egg) | ||
Description |
We recently ran salmonella with the
I attempted to track down the cause, but proved to be extremely difficult. It looks like it's not tuples itself that's in the wrong, but its use of the contracts egg is causing the trouble. When I compile the test suite of contracts with In the end I was able to reduce it to this program that fails: (use contracts) (define-with-contract (single xpr) (range (even? result)) (lambda (sel) (print xpr))) This is the warning I see: $ csc -specialize contracts-test.scm Warning: at toplevel: (contracts-test.scm:4) in procedure call to `g108109', expected 1 argument, but was given 0 arguments
When running with |